-
Easy and Free Ways to Sign PDF Documents on Windows
E-signing PDF documents is a common task these days. Perhaps you’re closing a deal, submitting your child’s school forms, or approving expense reports from your home office. Thankfully, signing documents has become more convenient than ever. And with powerful work laptops like the Acer TravelMate P4, you can easily handle tasks like signing PDFs, no matter where you’re working from.
Below, we explore three effective ways to sign PDFs for free: Microsoft Edge, Adobe Acrobat Reader, and online PDF signing tools.
Method 1: Using Microsoft Edge
Microsoft Edge is the default browser on Windows. It allows users to sign PDF documents using its built-in tools, primarily through the Draw feature. Just follow these steps:
* Open your PDF file in Microsoft Edge. Right-click on your PDF file, select Open With, and choose Microsoft Edge.
* Once the PDF opens, click the Draw option in the toolbar at the top of the window. There’s a drop-down menu that lets you choose the color and thickness of the pen stroke.
* Using your mouse, stylus, or touchpad, draw your signature directly on the document.
* After signing, click the Save icon in the toolbar to keep the signed document.
Using Microsoft Edge to sign PDFs is straightforward and free, and it doesn’t require any downloads. However, as drawing with a trackpad or mouse generally does not result in the most precise signatures, this method is best for informal agreements and personal use. For formal documents requiring legally binding signatures or enhanced security, consider using dedicated PDF signing software.
Method 2: Using Adobe Acrobat Reader DC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHRcyRSGZoE
Adobe Acrobat Reader is a widely used application for managing PDF documents. The basic version, known as Adobe Acrobat Reader DC, allows users to view, print, sign, and annotate PDFs for free. Here’s how to use its PDF signing functionality:
1. Download and install the free version of Adobe Acrobat Reader DC.
2. Open the PDF you want to sign. Right-click on your PDF file, choose Open With, and select Adobe Acrobat Reader. (Alternatively, launch Adobe Acrobat Reader, go to Menu, and click Open, then select the file to be signed.)
3. Click E-Sign on the top-left menu bar. This is a shortcut; you can also go to Fill & Sign under the All Tools menu. Both buttons will bring up the PDF signing options in the left pane.
* On your first time using Adobe Acrobat Reader to sign PDFs for free, you’ll have to create your signature. Go to Add Signature (or Add Initials), where you’ll find three options:
* Type: Enter your name and Acrobat will convert it into a signature-style font.
* Draw: Use your mouse or stylus to draw your signature.
* Image: Upload a photo of your signature.
Use any option to create a signature, then save it. The next time you want to sign a PDF with Acrobat Reader, you can simply click on your saved signature or initials.
5. Move your mouse to position your signature, then click to affix it. You can resize it if necessary.
6. Save your signed PDF.
Method 3: Using Online PDF Signing Tools
If you prefer not to install any additional software, there are numerous online tools that allow you to sign PDFs for free. This involves trusting a third-party service, so be cautious about uploading sensitive documents. Opt for well-known providers that deliver enhanced security. They’re also more likely to provide an array of features for both personal and professional use, such as legal compliance.
These are some popular PDF signing tools:
* SmallPDF
SmallPDF’s eSign PDF tool provides an intuitive interface for signing and editing PDFs. You can select or drag-and-drop files from your PC, or retrieve PDFs from your Dropbox or Google Drive. Draw or upload your signature, then download or share the signed PDF.
* PDF Filler
PDF Filler allows you to import documents from various sources, including URLs, email, and cloud storage like OneDrive and Google Drive. You can add a legally binding signature to a PDF by typing, drawing, or uploading an image.
* PDFgear
PDFgear offers both online and offline versions of its PDF editing tool. To sign a PDF online without installing the app, upload your document and go to Add or Edit Annotations. You can draw, type, or upload your signature.
* Jotform Sign
If you’re the one who needs to gather e-signatures, Jotform Sign can be particularly useful. It offers a free, user-friendly platform for creating legally binding documents. You can upload a PDF or use templates to create one. This tool has robust features for creating, sharing, and storing documents and can fully automate the signature collection flow.
For more PC tips as well as news and insights on topics like AI, Gaming, and Business, subscribe to the weekly Acer Corner Email Digest here.
Recommended Products
Aspire Spin 14 Laptop
Shop Now
TravelMate P4 Laptop
Shop Now
TravelMate 2 Laptop
Shop Now
About Micah Sulit: Micah is a writer and editor with a focus on lifestyle topics like tech, wellness, and travel. She loves writing while sipping an iced mocha in a cafe, preferably one in a foreign city. She's based in Manila, Philippines.
-
Why Should You Buy an ARM Laptop?
Have you ever considered the architecture of your computer? Not the overall design, but the architecture -that’s the design and structure of the CPU (central processing unit) as well as its instruction set (the bridge between software and hardware). The architecture defines how your CPU works and interacts with other parts of the computer.
Our focus today is ARM architecture and how it benefits laptop users, delivering epic battery life and lightweight, ultimate portability.
If you’re moving fast and don’t want to get slowed down by your laptop, then an ARM laptop may be just the ticket.
Read on to discover the spark that lit the recent rise in ARM based laptop popularity, as well as how they stack up next to traditional x86 architecture. Finally, we’ll finish with the Pros and Cons of ARM laptops and have a sneaky peek at the Acer Swift 14 AI Qualcomm PC.
What are ARM laptops?
ARM laptops focus on a small, highly optimized instruction set, and run on ARM operating systems such as Windows on ARM and macOS. Delivering power efficiency and greatly extended battery life, ARM laptops are designed to be slim and lightweight, while still holding their own in everyday multitasking.
Before we wade deeper into the ARM arena, let’s quickly cover a few useful architecture acronyms. ARM is short for Advanced RISC Machine, while RISC means Reduced Instruction Set Computing. Prioritizing energy efficiency and simplicity, RISC design is commonly found in smartphones and increasingly in other portable devices such as laptops.
You may be wondering what caused the sudden increase in popularity for Windows ARM laptops? Qualcomm's Snapdragon X Elite processor was showcased at Computex 2024, reigniting global interest in ARM laptops. This surge in interest was largely down to the game-changing CPU, delivering dramatic improvements in performance, battery life, and of course AI integration.
ARM vs x86 architecture
To understand the differences between traditional x86 architecture and ARM, we need to look at the differences in their ISA (instruction set architecture). In contrast to the reduced interaction set computing (RISC) approach used by ARM processors, the traditional x86 architecture uses CISC (complex interaction set computing). CISC uses a larger set of instructions to complete complex tasks in fewer steps. This enables increased flexibility and processing power, but with more power consumption.
In layman’s terms, ARM processors consume less power and generate less heat, but typically display lower performance than x86 processors at the same clock speed. In contrast, x86 processors have higher power consumption and heat production, resulting in higher performance and ability to handle complex instruction sets. The ARM vs x86 debate is not really a case of which one is better, as you can see in this article, but more a matter of power efficiency and simplicity (ARM) vs performance and flexibility (x86).
Pros of ARM computers
Top notch battery life. As we saw in Computex 2024, the battery life of ARM devices is quite remarkable. This is all thanks to their energy efficient design: the simplified instruction set performs tasks with fewer, simpler operations. This requires less power, as the amount of transistors and processing tasks per cycle are reduced, in turn minimizing heat production. In combination with multiple cores that can “rest” when not in use, ARM processors incorporate graphics and other components into a single chip reducing the need for bucketloads of electricity to power the device.
More apps on ARM. While apps designed for x86 processors traditionally needed to be recompiled or run through emulators to function on ARM architecture, there are now an increasing number of apps that can be run natively on ARM devices. There are also an increasing number of ARM compatible apps and even emulators to run non-native apps on ARM Windows laptops, as you can discover here.
Lightweight and ready for the road. High power efficiency coupled with slim-line design make ARM laptops incredibly portable. For PC users in search of a device that fits comfortably in their backpack or briefcase, while delivering 24 hr+ battery life, ARM laptops cannot be bested!
For a few dollars less. Although ARM powered Windows laptops are a relatively recent arrival, their price tags are eminently approachable. Combining lightweight portability with solid multitasking power and long battery life, ARM laptops deliver shockingly good value for money.
Cons of ARM computers
Compatibility. As we mentioned above, there are ongoing software compatibility issues as well as limited support for x86-64 applications. The x86-64 architecture is the 64-bit CPU used in most home computers and servers -resultantly most applications are designed to run on this instruction set. As it stands there are limited ARM-native and compatible software, and many developers haven’t transitioned their software to ARM.
Performance. For resource intensive tasks like 3D rendering, virtualization and hyper-threading, ARM architecture doesn’t cut the mustard. X86 devices are still the preferred platforms for complex instruction sets and high performance capabilities.
Gaming. Let’s not forget gaming! With lower performance compared to x86 processors at the same clock speed, ARM processors won’t be able to handle AAA titles high end gaming. As you can see here, emulation is possible, and can be successful and efficient, but at this point in time, most games aren’t natively compatible with ARM architecture as they’re built for x86-x64 architecture.
Why should you arm yourself with an ARM computer?
If you’re after a laptop for general productivity and multitasking, then an ARM powered device may be the way forward. For stylish portability that won’t require you to remortgage your home, ARM laptops offer great bang for your buck. The lightweight, all-day battery life encourages productivity wherever you go, and when the day is done, ARM laptops are also the perfect platform for multimedia consumption.
The Acer Swift 14 AI Qualcomm PC is a Copilot+ PC powered by the Snapdragon X Series processor. Weighing in at 1.36kg, the 14.5-inch 2.5K touchscreen laptops can deliver up to 26 hours battery life before charging. Designed for the future, the Swift 14 AI is performance optimized for demanding tasks and sweat-free multitasking. Featuring AI integration throughout the device, form seamlessly meets function in the Swift 14 AI. For an exceptionally fast responsive and aesthetically pleasing introduction to the ARM, try out the Swift 14 AI today, and step into the future of on-the-go computing.
Recommended Products
Swift 14 AI Laptop (Qualcomm)
Buy Now
Swift 14 AI Laptop (Qualcomm)
Buy Now
-
Major AAA Gaming Flops of 2024
2024 has seen its fair share of amazing games from major AAA developers, but not all have lived up to the hype. Despite massive budgets, talented development teams, and established franchises behind them, some of the year's biggest titles have failed to capture players' attention or meet the lofty expectations set for them. From disappointing gameplay mechanics to misguided design choices, these major gaming flops highlight the unpredictable nature of the industry. In this article, we’ll explore some of the most notable failures of the year, delving into what went wrong for each title.
1. Skull & Bones (Metacritic 59)
Skull & Bones has faced significant challenges since its release, making it one of Ubisoft's more underwhelming projects in recent years. While the game had potential, a combination of factors led to its struggle in the market.
One of the main issues was the game's lengthy development cycle, which lasted over a decade. Reports indicate that Ubisoft invested between $650 and $850 million into Skull & Bones, far exceeding the originally estimated $200 million. This extended development, with multiple redesigns, caused the project to balloon in cost, putting extra pressure on the game to succeed financially. Unfortunately, the return on this investment has yet to materialize, with the game struggling to capture a large player base.
At launch, Skull & Bones attracted around 850,000 players, but many of these were trial players taking advantage of the 8-hour free access. The game's high price tag of $70 also became a sticking point for many, with some critics and even Ubisoft employees suggesting it should have been priced lower, between $30 and $40. This price barrier likely discouraged a significant number of potential buyers, particularly given the mixed reception the game received.
While the game offered ship combat and open-world exploration, many players found these elements to be less engaging than expected. The combat mechanics were often described as clunky, and the open world felt somewhat restrictive. Players were hoping for a more dynamic, immersive pirate experience, similar to what Ubisoft had achieved with Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag, but Skull & Bones struggled to offer that same level of depth. The live-service model and some repetitive gameplay loops may have further contributed to its inability to maintain player interest long-term.
Despite the challenges, the game did manage to build a core of dedicated players, with reports of those who stayed averaging three to four hours of play daily. However, this core audience wasn't enough to generate the buzz or ongoing success needed for a game of this scale. Currently, the player base has dwindled, with around 350-400 daily active players on Steam, a far cry from what Ubisoft had hoped for.
Skull & Bones was ambitious, but a combination of high expectations, pricing concerns, and gameplay that didn’t fully resonate with a broad audience led to its underperformance. Ubisoft has the opportunity to pivot and potentially revive interest in Skull & Bones, and perhaps under Tencent's leadership, things could change. For now, however, the game serves as a reminder of the challenges faced when large-scale projects fall short of expectations.
2. Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League (Metacritic 60)
Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League was a major flop due to a combination of misguided design choices, development mismanagement, and a failure to engage players in a crowded market. Developed by Rocksteady, known for its acclaimed Batman: Arkham series, the game suffered from a shift in focus from single-player storytelling to a live-service looter-shooter model, a genre the studio had no prior experience with. The decision to emphasize gun-based combat over the melee mechanics that Rocksteady had perfected in the Arkham series confused many players, especially given the nature of characters like Captain Boomerang and King Shark, who are traditionally associated with melee combat. This pivot felt forced and at odds with the characters, making the gameplay feel dissonant and unengaging.
Another major issue was the repetitiveness of the missions and encounters. The game primarily offered rinse-and-repeat objectives like "defend the area" or "defeat waves of enemies," with little variety or creativity in its mission design. This was further compounded by uninspired endgame content, such as the post-game "Incursions," which reused missions from the main campaign. Such uninspired design led many players to abandon the game after completing the campaign, which is a significant problem for a live-service game designed to retain players over time.
Rocksteady's perfectionist culture also contributed to the game's downfall. The studio experienced numerous delays and shifts in direction throughout the game's development, with leadership struggling to clearly communicate and review work, leading to inefficient development. The rigid perfectionism slowed progress and led to discarded content and ideas, resulting in a bloated and disjointed final product.
Despite a massive $200 million budget, Suicide Squad failed to attract a wide audience, receiving only a 60 out of 100 on Metacritic and poor player reception. Warner Bros. had hoped to recreate the success of other live-service games like Destiny, but the game’s lack of imaginative content, tedious gameplay loops, and poor alignment with Rocksteady's strengths ultimately sealed its fate as one of the biggest flops in gaming.
3. Senua's Saga: Hellblade II (Metacritic 81)
Hellblade 2 was disappointing to many because it focused heavily on visuals and sound design, at the expense of gameplay and storytelling. While it is visually stunning and a technical marvel, the game failed to evolve in ways that many expected. Hellblade 2 felt more like an interactive movie, with much of the game revolving around walking, solving simple puzzles, and fighting in limited combat encounters. The combat, in particular, felt pared back, lacking the complexity and dynamics found in the first game. Instead of engaging, varied encounters, players primarily face single enemies in confined spaces, reducing the sense of challenge.
The story also received criticism for being shallow and disjointed. Though Hellblade 2 attempted to explore meaningful themes, such as trauma, mental illness, and cycles of violence, these concepts were not as impactful or well-developed as they were in Hellblade: Senua’s Sacrifice. The narrative felt muddled, repetitive, and often undermined by simplistic dialogue and overbearing voices. This detracted from the introspective and emotional depth that made the first game so beloved.
Ultimately, the game’s prioritization of visual fidelity over meaningful gameplay and storytelling left many feeling that Hellblade 2 missed the mark. Despite being a visually impressive showcase, it lacked the emotional and interactive depth that fans had hoped for, making the experience feel shallow and unsatisfying. This focus on aesthetics over substance caused the game to fall short of expectations, leaving players wanting more in terms of engagement and narrative progression.
4. Star Wars Outlaws (Metacritic 75)
Star Wars Outlaws was expected to be a hit, given its open-world design and the massive Star Wars franchise backing it. However, the game has underperformed, selling a million copies since its release, which is still significantly better than Skull & Bones. Several key factors contributed to its lukewarm reception and lackluster sales.
First, Outlaws struggled to stand out in a saturated market. Ubisoft, once known for revolutionizing open-world games, has seen its formula grow stale over the years. The game’s release came at a time when Ubisoft’s reputation was already in decline, plagued by repetitive gameplay mechanics and a lack of innovation across their titles. Although Outlaws was marketed as the first open-world Star Wars game, many players felt it didn't offer enough new experiences. The game felt too similar to previous Star Wars titles, and the 'open-world' aspect didn't feel as novel when compared to other games with similar mechanics, like Jedi: Fallen Order.
A major issue was the lack of a compelling narrative or strong protagonist. The main character, Kay Vess, was criticized for being bland and directionless. Her lack of personal growth or unique character development made it difficult for players to connect with her journey, which left the overall story feeling unengaging. The supporting cast, although filled with quirky characters like the adorable sidekick Nix, didn’t offer enough to elevate the story or provide a sense of depth. As a result, the game lacked the emotional weight and memorable character arcs seen in other Star Wars games like Jedi: Fallen Order or Knights of the Old Republic.
The gameplay, while solid, also failed to impress. The stealth and combat systems were functional but lacked the complexity or rewarding challenge seen in better action-adventure games. For instance, stealth missions were easy to bypass due to weak AI, and the combat system, though responsive, felt repetitive and uninspired. While the game did feature space combat, many found it clunky and unexciting, with poorly executed mechanics that hindered the overall experience. These issues led to a gameplay loop that, while competent, failed to capture the thrill or immersion fans expected from a Star Wars game.
Additionally, Outlaws suffered from technical performance issues. Players encountered frequent frame drops, texture bugs, and overall performance dips, especially on higher-end systems. These issues, compounded by a lack of polish, further detracted from the player experience, leaving many feeling the game was rushed to market without sufficient refinement.
Star Wars Outlaws underperformed due to its lack of innovation, a weak protagonist, repetitive gameplay, and technical issues. While the game had moments of brilliance, particularly in its sound design and environmental visuals, it didn’t do enough to stand out in a crowded market. Ubisoft’s reliance on a tired open-world formula and failure to deliver a memorable narrative doomed Outlaws to be a forgettable entry in the Star Wars gaming universe.
5. Concord (Metacritic 62)
Concord, a live-service hero shooter developed by Firewalk Studios and published by PlayStation, is widely regarded as a significant commercial failure. Despite an extensive development period of eight years and a budget exceeding an allegeed $400 million, Concord launched to an alarmingly low player count of just 697 at its peak on Steam. This dismal performance is even more shocking considering the game's veteran development team, which included former Bungie and Activision talent.
One of the core reasons for Concord's failure lies in its timing. Development began around 2016, with the aim of competing against Overwatch. However, by the time Concord released, the hero shooter genre had already matured, with major competitors like Apex Legends and Overwatch 2 dominating the space. Concord’s eight-year development cycle meant that it arrived too late to capitalize on the hero shooter trend, and its gameplay and design failed to bring anything innovative to the table. The game’s $40 price tag, in a market where most live-service games are free-to-play, further alienated potential players. This pricing misstep, combined with a lack of standout features, led to poor sales, estimated at only 25,000 units, recovering less than 1% of its development costs.
In addition to its untimely release, Concord struggled with poor marketing. Despite being featured in PlayStation’s promotional showcases and even having plans for an animated spin-off series, the game failed to generate excitement or anticipation among the gaming community. Its trailers and gameplay demonstrations were uninspiring, with many criticizing the bland art style and unappealing character designs.
Finally, the broader issue of Concord's failure is emblematic of the challenges facing modern AAA game development. Lengthy development cycles and rising player expectations for cutting-edge graphics and expansive worlds have made it harder for studios to predict what will succeed when their game finally launches. In Concord's case, this resulted in a polished, but ultimately stale, product that lacked the innovation and excitement needed to attract and retain players.
Despite the developer's efforts to acknowledge feedback and offer refunds, Concord was unable to recover from its disastrous launch, shutting down just two weeks after release.
What’s next?
These flops serve as stark reminders that innovation, player engagement, and polished execution are just as crucial as big budgets and recognizable franchises. As developers push boundaries, the risks of missing the mark grow, leaving both studios and players grappling with disappointment. However, these failures also highlight opportunities for growth, as studios can learn from their missteps and pivot toward more successful ventures in the future.
Recommended Products
Nitro 5
Buy Now
Nitro 50
Buy Now
-
Getting Started with GitHub Copilot: Tips for Maximizing Efficiency
GitHub Copilot is transforming the way developers write code. Powered by AI, Copilot acts like a coding assistant by offering suggestions, completing functions, and helping you navigate tricky coding challenges in real time, thus making coding more efficient and less daunting, whether you're a seasoned developer or just starting out.
Maximizing the benefits of GitHub Copilot isn’t just about installing it—it's about knowing how to use it effectively and integrating it into your workflow. In this post, we’ll walk you through the steps for getting started with GitHub Copilot, from setting it up and customizing your environment to using best practices that make it an invaluable part of your development process. We’ll also explore how to make Copilot a natural extension of your coding style so that it complements your work and enhances productivity across all your projects.
Setting Up GitHub Copilot
Getting started with GitHub Copilot is simple, but a few tips can help you set it up for the best experience. Here are the essential steps to get Copilot up and running and ready to enhance your coding.
1. Installing GitHub Copilot
To use GitHub Copilot, you’ll need Visual Studio Code (VS Code), one of the most popular Integrated Development Environments (IDEs). Copilot is available as a VS Code extension, and installation is straightforward:
Open VS Code: Navigate to the Extensions view by clicking on the square icon in the sidebar or pressing Ctrl+Shift+X.
Search for "GitHub Copilot": Once you find the extension, click Install to add it to your VS Code.
To activate Copilot, you’ll need a GitHub account with access to either a free trial or a subscription plan. After installation, you’ll be prompted to log in or sign up for GitHub Copilot, and once authenticated, the extension will be ready to use.
2. Configuration Tips for Personalization
After setting up, take a moment to configure Copilot to align with your coding style and needs and maximize the tool’s potential:
* Toggle suggestions: You can control when Copilot provides suggestions. For example, you might want it to show suggestions only for certain programming languages. Head to the Copilot settings in VS Code to toggle these options on or off.
* Adjust keybindings: If you find Copilot’s keyboard shortcuts for accepting or rejecting suggestions don’t quite work with your coding habits, customize them to better fit your workflow. Navigate to VS Code’s keybindings settings and modify Copilot's shortcuts for a smoother experience.
* Adjust preferences for code blocks and comments: If you prefer receiving suggestions for longer code blocks or for particular comment prompts, you can adjust how Copilot responds based on the context you give it. This allows you to steer the AI towards providing suggestions that are most helpful for your coding style.
3. Supported Languages and Environments
GitHub Copilot is designed to support a wide variety of programming languages and environments. While it works best with languages like JavaScript, Python, TypeScript, Ruby, and Go, its capabilities are constantly expanding. While it’s optimized for use in VS Code, it continues to extend support to other editors and IDEs.
Once you have Copilot installed and configured, you’re ready to start coding more effectively. The real power of GitHub Copilot lies in how you use it to complement your coding style, which we’ll explore next.
Best Practices for Using GitHub Copilot Effectively
To make the most of GitHub Copilot, it's essential to use it strategically. These best practices will help you get more accurate suggestions, improve your workflow, and ensure the AI complements your coding style.
1. Using GitHub Copilot for Code Suggestions
GitHub Copilot is designed to assist you by suggesting code snippets, autocompleting lines, and even creating entire functions based on your needs. A practical tip for prompting accurate suggestions is to write clear and context-rich comments before you start coding. For example, typing a comment like // create a function to filter out invalid email addresses will give Copilot context to offer a suitable function outline. The more specific and descriptive your comments are, the better Copilot will be at generating helpful suggestions.
You can also use Copilot to speed up repetitive coding tasks. For instance, it can automatically generate code for data structure manipulations, error handling, and boilerplate logic, freeing up time for you to focus on more complex coding challenges.
2. Refining AI-Generated Code
While GitHub Copilot is powerful, it’s not perfect—you should still review and refine its suggestions. Always check the AI-generated code for:
* Correctness: Verify that the code does what you intend and test it in your environment.
* Security: Be cautious of security flaws, especially when handling user input or sensitive data.
* Adherence to guidelines: Ensure the code aligns with your project’s style guide and coding standards. A consistent approach helps maintain readability and reduces errors.
3. Shortcuts and Time-Saving Techniques
Efficiency is key when using GitHub Copilot, and there are several shortcuts to maximize your productivity:
* Accepting suggestions: Use Tab to accept a suggestion quickly. This keeps your workflow smooth without having to break from typing.
* Cycling through suggestions: If Copilot provides multiple suggestions, press Alt + ] to navigate to the next suggestion and Alt + [ to go back. This allows you to find the best fit for your context.
* Manually triggering suggestions: If you need to bring up suggestions at any time, press Ctrl + Enter to see what Copilot can offer. This is especially useful if you're stuck or want to explore alternative approaches to a problem.
Integrating GitHub Copilot into Your Workflow
GitHub Copilot works best when it naturally integrates into your coding workflow, supporting your coding style rather than dictating it. Here are some tips on how to blend Copilot seamlessly into your day-to-day development.
1. Complementing Your Coding Style
One of the key advantages of GitHub Copilot is its ability to adapt to different coding styles. It’s important to let Copilot enhance your workflow without feeling like you're giving up control. If Copilot makes suggestions that work with your style, it’s a great way to validate your approach. If not, use it as an opportunity to refine the code manually, letting Copilot support your unique preferences.
2. Balancing Copilot and Manual Coding
While GitHub Copilot can assist in coding, it’s still important to know when to lean on its suggestions and when to write code manually. Use Copilot to handle:
Boilerplate and repetitive code: Let Copilot automate the repetitive parts of your code, like structuring loops or setting up basic functions.
Generating quick prototypes: When you need a quick draft or exploratory code, let Copilot do the heavy lifting so you can iterate quickly.
On the other hand, consider writing code manually when:
Implementing core logic: For critical business logic or sensitive parts of your application, manual coding ensures the solution is tailored and precise.
Learning new concepts: If you're exploring a new framework or language, writing code yourself helps reinforce your learning.
Ultimately, remember that Copilot is a helper, not a replacement. Balancing its suggestions with your expertise allows you to maintain control while still benefiting from its capabilities.
3. Enhancing Collaboration with Copilot Chat
For teams working on shared codebases, GitHub Copilot Chat can be a game changer. Copilot Chat acts as an AI-based conversational assistant that helps developers understand code context, offer real-time suggestions, and even debug issues through chat. It can improve collaboration by:
Providing code context: When you're working on a file someone else wrote, you can ask Copilot Chat to explain what certain functions or variables do, speeding up the onboarding process.
Enhancing code reviews: Copilot Chat can suggest alternative approaches during code reviews, providing additional perspectives on how to improve code quality or optimize performance.
By integrating Copilot into your existing development practices, you can streamline workflows, enhance collaboration, and ultimately become a more efficient coder.
Boosting Performance and Getting Started with GitHub Copilot
To get the most out of GitHub Copilot, having a capable device is crucial. Running Copilot efficiently alongside development tools requires reliable performance to ensure quick suggestions and a smooth workflow. A laptop like the Acer Swift X 14 provides the processing power and speed necessary to keep up with intensive coding sessions, letting you focus on creating and refining code without interruptions.
Ready to transform your coding experience? Try out GitHub Copilot and see how it can elevate your work. To stay updated on the latest tech, tools, and tips, subscribe to the Acer Corner email digest and stay informed on how to enhance your productivity and keep up with industry trends.
Recommended Products
Swift X 14 Laptop
Shop Now
Aspire TC Desktop
Shop Now
Aspire 5 Spin 14 Laptop
Shop Now
About Maxine Sheppard: Maxine is a writer and editor who specializes in topics ranging from travel, tech and music to wildlife and design. When not writing, you might find her driving through a national park with the radio on loud.
-
5 Best SCP Games to Play in 2024
The SCP Foundation has long been a source of fascination for fans of horror, mystery, and the unknown. Its universe of anomalous objects, creatures, and phenomena that defy explanation has inspired countless creative projects, with video games being one of the most prominent. These games allow players to step into the role of researchers, survivors, or even SCP entities themselves, experiencing the chilling unpredictability of a world where reality is not always as it seems. In 2024, there are several standout titles that offer unique interpretations of the SCP universe, blending horror, survival, and action. Here are five of the best SCP games to dive into this year.
What is the SCP Foundation?
The SCP Foundation is a fictional organization responsible for securing, containing, and protecting anomalous objects, entities, and phenomena that pose a threat to humanity or challenge our understanding of reality. These anomalies, known as SCPs, range from dangerous monsters to mysterious artifacts with inexplicable powers. Examples include:
* SCP-173: A statue that moves rapidly and lethally when not observed, requiring constant surveillance to prevent attacks.
* SCP-096: A humanoid entity that becomes uncontrollably aggressive when someone views its face, pursuing the viewer until they are eliminated.
* SCP-3008: An abandoned IKEA store that leads to a seemingly infinite labyrinth where people are trapped and pursued by faceless humanoids, especially when the lights are off.
Each SCP is given a designation and a unique file detailing its properties, containment procedures, and potential risks. This collaborative storytelling project has grown into a vast, ever-expanding universe with contributions from writers, artists, and game developers alike.
1. SCP: Containment Breach
SCP: Containment Breach is one of the earliest and most successful adaptations of the SCP universe into gaming. Originally released in 2012, it captured the tension and mystery of a facility overrun by dangerous anomalies. Featuring iconic SCPs like SCP-173, a statue that only moves when unobserved, and SCP-106, a Keter class monster that can phases through walls, the game keeps players on edge through strategic survival mechanics, such as the blinking feature that forces players to look away at crucial moments.
While the Unity remake was ultimately canceled, a remastered version is now available on Steam, offering updated visuals and mechanics that enhance the original’s gameplay. This remastered edition brings back the eerie atmosphere of the game while improving its overall presentation. It’s a welcome addition for both new players and long-time fans who want to revisit the classic horror experience with modern updates.
Despite its rough edges compared to bigger-budget horror games, Containment Breach continues to engage players with its randomly generated facility, unpredictable SCP encounters, and exploration-based horror. It remains a standout in the SCP gaming world, and the remastered version gives it a fresh life for today's audience.
2. SCP: Secret Laboratory
SCP: Secret Laboratory, originally released in 2017, is an online multiplayer game set in the SCP universe, blending horror, survival, and team-based elements. Over time, it has evolved to become a well-rounded game that prioritizes player agency, where individual decisions significantly affect outcomes.
The core gameplay features SCP breaches, with participants assuming roles as either SCP anomalies or human factions. The unpredictability of player actions keeps the experience fresh, making each match feel distinct. Strategic thinking, teamwork, and sometimes deception are critical as players navigate tense situations.
Despite its strengths, Secret Laboratory does have some drawbacks. Toxic player lobbies and occasional balancing issues, especially in certain inescapable scenarios, can disrupt the experience. Some older assets remain from its earlier iterations, which can feel dated compared to the more polished updates. However, the developers continue to release updates and patches, reflecting their commitment to the community.
Overall, Secret Laboratory stands out for its immersive multiplayer experience, where the SCP universe serves as a dynamic backdrop for player-driven storytelling. It remains a solid option for fans of survival horror looking for a game driven by strategic, unpredictable player interaction.
3. SCP: 5k
SCP: 5K is a tactical horror shooter released in Early Access on Steam in February 2022, initially called SCP: Pandemic. Developed by Afrey Interactive, the game takes a different approach compared to fast-paced shooters like Doom or World War Z, offering a more methodical and immersive experience.
With a focus on realism, the game’s atmosphere and gunplay are highly polished, making it appealing for players who enjoy milsim-style shooters. The cooperative gameplay is best experienced with friends, supporting up to four players in the main missions and eight in some modes. There's also a PVP mode for up to 14 players, which adds variety.
Currently, SCP: 5K offers two main missions that take around three hours to complete, but they are replayable due to the engaging enemy encounters and weapon mechanics. The game also features a wide range of weapons, including pistols, assault rifles, and shotguns, all customizable with different attachments.
While the game is still in Early Access with room to grow, the developers frequently release updates and add new content. For those interested in tactical shooters or the SCP universe, SCP: 5K offers an intriguing experience, even at this stage.
4. SCP: Fragmented Minds
SCP: Fragmented Minds offers an exciting and immersive experience that promises to capture the essence of the SCP universe. The game has undergone extensive development since its demo, with improvements to nearly every aspect of gameplay, ensuring a polished and thrilling experience for players. The developers have not only upgraded the models of iconic SCPs like 682 and 966, but they’ve also introduced new variants such as SCP 3199 Elder and Baby, which adds variety and challenge to encounters. These creatures each have unique abilities that force you to adapt your strategies, making the game feel unpredictable, just like the SCP lore.
The game also features a vast range of environments, from the eerie Site 113 to Martian caves, bringing a detailed and atmospheric world to life. Whether you’re exploring dark corridors or trying to outwit deadly anomalies, the game’s dynamic AI and reworked stealth mechanics will push you to think critically about how you approach each situation.
The combat and movement systems have been completely overhauled, with fluid melee attacks, dodge mechanics, and even hacking systems that allow for more strategic gameplay. You’ll have access to tools like the welder, which can shock enemies or manipulate power systems, deepening your interaction with the environment.
With the devs gearing up for Early Access in late 2024 to early 2025, this game is shaping up to be the most ambitious SCP title yet, blending action, survival horror, and intense SCP encounters. For those who want an early taste of the game, you can wishlist SCP: Fragmented Minds on Steam and play the demo.
5. SCP: Blackout
SCP: Blackout was originally developed as a non-VR horror game, with VR support added later, expanding its immersive potential. Set within a secure facility teeming with escaped anomalies, the game taps into the eerie unpredictability that fans of SCP lore will appreciate. However, SCP: Blackout has a mixed legacy.
Originally released in 2019, the game still gives off an incomplete feeling, with some modes labeled "under construction" even years later. The absence of a fully realized story mode, which is still being worked on, might disappoint players expecting a more polished narrative experience. Instead, most of the gameplay focuses on survival mode, which, while tense, can feel rough around the edges.
One of the game’s standout features is its expansive and well-detailed environment, which draws you into the unsettling SCP facility. However, performance issues, especially in VR, detract from the immersion. Glitches like disappearing menus or erratic sound effects during certain encounters can interrupt the flow. Some SCPs feel a bit underwhelming compared to more iconic characters from the SCP universe, making the horror hit-or-miss at times.
Despite its flaws, SCP: Blackout remains an intriguing title for those who enjoy the SCP mythos. The potential for atmospheric tension and surprising moments is there, and the game provides a glimpse into a vast, dangerous world. If you're willing to overlook some jank and are a fan of psychological horror, it’s still worth exploring—whether you choose to play in VR or not.
Secure, Contain, Protect
The SCP universe offers a rich and immersive backdrop for horror gaming, and 2024 continues to deliver exceptional experiences for fans of the genre. Whether you're drawn to classic titles like SCP: Containment Breach or looking forward to ambitious projects like SCP: Fragmented Minds, there's a game for every type of player. From tactical shooters to multiplayer survival and intense horror encounters, the SCP games on this list showcase the creativity and versatility of the community. For those looking to dive deeper into the lore of SCP anomalies, Dr Bob and SCP Explained - Story & Animation’s YouTube channel is a fantastic resource, offering engaging and well-animated videos that explore the mysteries of these anomalous entities.
Recommended Products
Nitro 5
Buy Now
Nitro 50
Buy Now
-
Acer Aspire C24 All-in-One Desktop: Style, Function, and Power in a Compact Package
With more and more households transitioning to hybrid work setups and online learning, the demand for a versatile, easy-to-manage computer has never been higher. All-in-one (AIO) PCs provide a solution that combines form and function. These desktops integrate the internal components, display, and speakers into a single sleek unit, removing the need for a separate tower or a tangle of cables. An AIO computer delivers the same performance as a traditional desktop while allowing you to maximize your desk space.
The Acer Aspire C24 is an all-in-one PC that’s ideal for both home offices and shared family workstations. Whether you’re using it for productivity or entertainment, it reliably offers capable processing in a compact, clutter-free package.
At a glance, these are the specs of the Aspire C24 All-in-One Desktop, specifically the C24-1700-UR11 model:
Operating System: Windows 11 Home
Display: 23.8" Full HD (1920x1080) Active Matrix TFT Color LCD
Processor: Intel® Core™ i3-1215U Hexa-core (up to 4.4GHz)
Graphics: Intel® UHD Graphics
Memory: 8GB DDR4 SDRAM
Storage: 256GB SSD
Networking: Gigabit Ethernet, Wi-Fi 6, and Bluetooth 5.0
Connectivity: 5 USB ports and 1 HDMI port
Webcam: Built-in 5.0 MP HD webcam with cover
Maximum Wattage: 65W
Dimensions: 16" (height) x 21.4" (width) x 1.5" (depth)
Weight: Approximately 15.4 lbs
Additional Features: Wireless keyboard and wireless mouse included
Design, Build, and Display Quality
The Acer Aspire C24-1700-UR11 is encased in an ultra-slim frame that takes up little desk space. Offering a minimalist all-black design that’s both functional and aesthetically pleasing, this all-in-one desktop has a solid build quality. It’s constructed primarily from plastic with a brushed finish that mimics metal, lending it a premium appearance despite its budget-friendly price point.
The 23.8-inch Full HD LCD display is framed by impressively thin bezels to maximize the screen real estate and allow for a more immersive viewing experience. The screen is tiltable, giving users more freedom to adjust it for comfort, and has a matte surface that effectively reduces glare. It also uses Acer’s BlueLightShield™ technology, which reduces exposure to blue light.
Processors and Memory
A 12th Generation Intel Core i3-1215U processor powers the Aspire C24 all-in-one PC. This six-core processor (it has 2 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores) is well-suited for everyday computing tasks, such as browsing the web and working on assorted document types. There’s 8GB of DDR4 RAM providing sufficient memory for multitasking, and it’s expandable up to 32GB. The system also includes a 256GB SSD for storage. This Acer C24 model’s integrated Intel UHD Graphics allows for smooth video playback and casual gaming, though bear in mind that it’s not designed for high-end gaming or intensive graphic design tasks.
Connectivity
The Aspire C24 comes with a wireless keyboard and mouse to minimize cable clutter. That’s not to say this all-in-one PC monitor lacks connectivity options for all your peripherals, wired or otherwise. There’s an easily accessible USB 2.0 Type-A port on the bottom of the display, ideal for connecting external storage drives without reaching around the back, where the rest of the ports are. Those include a USB 3.2 Type-C Gen 2 port, a USB 3.2 Type-A Gen 2 port, and two USB 3.2 Type-A Gen 1 ports. You can also connect external displays via HDMI, or use the Gigabit Ethernet port for reliable wired connections. For wireless connectivity, the Acer Aspire C24 is equipped with Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.0.
Above the display sits a 5.0 MP webcam that’s great for video conferencing, whether for work or leisure. It has a sliding lens cover so you don’t have to worry about privacy. The webcam is paired with dual microphones to ensure clear audio and video quality during meetings, virtual classes, or video calls with loved ones.
A Compact Desktop PC That Doesn’t Compromise on Performance
All in all, the Acer Aspire C24 1700 UR11 offers a compelling combination of modern design, solid hardware specifications, and user-friendly features. It’s an all-in-one desktop that’s great for working from home, connecting with colleagues and loved ones via video calls, or enjoying a family movie night.
Recommended Products
Aspire C24 All-in-One
Desktop
Shop Now
Aspire C24 All-in-One
Desktop
Shop Now
Aspire C24 All-in-One
Desktop
Shop Now
About Micah Sulit: Micah is a writer and editor with a focus on lifestyle topics like tech, wellness, and travel. She loves writing while sipping an iced mocha in a cafe, preferably one in a foreign city. She's based in Manila, Philippines.