XR341CK Wish List - Feedback Thread Here

Toolguns
Toolguns Member Posts: 5 New User

Regarding the 21:9 aspect ratio G-sync Monitor that Acer is supposedly working on...  
Please see below and if the community would like to add any input it would also be appreciated.

 

1. 34"  3440 x 1440p IPS Panel with G-Sync Support - Subtle Curve of the Panel would be awesome.

2. 144hz Refresh Rate

3. Response time of 4MS or lower  (The XB270HU is a perfect comparison, 4ms with virtually no Signal Processing Lag)

3. Semi-Matte finish

4. NO GLOSSY BEZELS OR BASE PLEASE

5. Please add a small LED light indicator showing if Monitor is in G-sync, ULMB, or any other modes (different colors for each)

6. 3 year warranty, since this monitor will probably be expensive.

7. Quality Control for any excessive backlight bleeding. (Package this monitor well, LG 34um95 horror stories on Amazon)

8. Height Adjust Stand and also VESA mount option.

9. Options to drive monitor at 16:9 ratio (IE 2560 x 1440P with black bars on each side) - gamers sometimes want to run lower resolutions for higher performance in certain games or for competitive reasons, please include this option.

10. Screen Splitter Option for Multitasking and productivity.

11. HDMI connectivity?  (I know G-sync currently limited to Display Port, but a hybrid engine monitor?)

12. MSRP at $1,000 or lower?

 

Thanks Acer - Waiting for an official announce of specifications on this Monitor!  

Answers

  • Mav3rick84
    Mav3rick84 Member Posts: 1 New User
    I love it man, great list. I hope they are taking notes!

    Hybrid scaler like the Benq XL2420G, need solid 1080p via HDMI for current gen consoles, profile that maps it 1x1 Would be great, I'd be willing to loose some screen to get the organic res on the panel with a 1080p source

    144hz refresh with the anti-blur tech

    So many great ideas there, you should be on their staff for product design.

    If cost is a factor, I could sacrifice the resolution down to 1080p tall since I'm running a gtx970m and the height adjust doesn't do anything for me since I use vesa arms exclusively.

    Everything else there is gospel. Thank you so much for posting this up on their home turf, hopefully they are listening.
  • Toolguns
    Toolguns Member Posts: 5 New User

    I would hope so too.  

    I know it's an extensive list, but I know enthusiasts will pay top dollar to get an all in one monitor solution.  

  • fynxer
    fynxer Member Posts: 3 New User

    FAIL....FAIL....FAIL....FAIL....FAIL....FAIL....FAIL....FAIL....FAIL....FAIL....

     

    Spec are out and the XR341CK is 75Hz ONLY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

     

    Can i say it more clearly, a FAIL OF LEGENDARY MAGNITUDES.

     

    YOU REALLY DIDN'T GET THAT 98% OF ALL CUSTOMERS WAITING FOR THIS MONITOR WANTED 144Hz

     

    This is the most eager awaited monitor in the gaming community at this time AND YOU "ACER" TOTALLY FAILED TO DELIVER

     

    Watching the tread at Sweclockers.com when the news hit about IPS 75Hz was a disaster.

     

    98% of all users totally puked at 75Hz THEY WANTED 144Hz

     

    The XR341CK would have been your golden goose this autumn/winter.

     

    IF YOU HAD GIVEN IT 144Hz YOU WOULD HAD ERNED A MOUNTAIN OF GOLD now you will only get a nugget instead.

     

    The XR341CK was the most hyped up monitor in ages, now without 144Hz the bobble is bursted and you will never get back that insane amount of customers willing to buy it.

     

    YOU COULD NOT HAVE BOUGHT ADVERTISING LIKE THIS AND YOU RUINED IT.

     

    I will NEVER pay like 999 GBP for 75Hz, IN YOUR DREAMS !!!

     

    FIRE THE GUY RESPONSIBLE !!!

  • flynnsk
    flynnsk Member Posts: 1 New User

     

     


    fynxer wrote:

    FAIL....FAIL....FAIL....FAIL....FAIL....FAIL....FAIL....FAIL....FAIL....FAIL....

     

    Spec are out and the XR341CK is 75Hz ONLY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

     

    Can i say it more clearly, a FAIL OF LEGENDARY MAGNITUDES.

     

    YOU REALLY DIDN'T GET THAT 98% OF ALL CUSTOMERS WAITING FOR THIS MONITOR WANTED 144Hz

     

    This is the most eager awaited monitor in the gaming community at this time AND YOU "ACER" TOTALLY FAILED TO DELIVER

     

    Watching the tread at Sweclockers.com when the news hit about IPS 75Hz was a disaster.

     

    98% of all users totally puked at 75Hz THEY WANTED 144Hz

     

    The XR341CK would have been your golden goose this autumn/winter.

     

    IF YOU HAD GIVEN IT 144Hz YOU WOULD HAD ERNED A MOUNTAIN OF GOLD now you will only get a nugget instead.

     

    The XR341CK was the most hyped up monitor in ages, now without 144Hz the bobble is bursted and you will never get back that insane amount of customers willing to buy it.

     

    YOU COULD NOT HAVE BOUGHT ADVERTISING LIKE THIS AND YOU RUINED IT.

     

    I will NEVER pay like 999 GBP for 75Hz, IN YOUR DREAMS !!!

     

    FIRE THE GUY RESPONSIBLE !!!


     

    FAIL belongs to OP and anyone else thinking a 3440x1440 display is going to be 144Hz anytime soon.

    1st of DisplayPort 

     

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisplayPort

     

     

    The DisplayPort connector can have one, two, or four differential data pairs (lanes) in a Main Link, each with a raw bit rate of 1.62, 2.7, 5.4, or 8.1 Gbit/s per lane with self-clock running at 162, 270, 540, or 810 MHz. The effective data rates after decoding are 1.296, 2.16, 4.32, or 6.48 Gbit/s per lane (or 80% of the total), since data is 8b/10b encoded so each eight bits of information are encoded with a ten-bit symbol.

    ...

     

     

     

    Forward link channel with 1 to 4 lanes; effective data rate 1.296 (reduced bit rate), 2.16 (high bit rate), 4.32 (HBR2), or 6.48 Gbit/s (HBR3) per lane (total 5.184, 8.64, 17.28, or 25.92 Gbit/s for a 4-lane link)

     

     

    DispalyPort 1.2 = High Bit Rate = 17.28 Gbit/s (

     

     

    1.2
    DisplayPort version 1.2 was approved on December 22, 2009. The most significant improvement of the new version is the doubling of the effective bandwidth to 17.28 Gbit/s in High Bit Rate 2 (HBR2) mode

     

    ... it comes down to simple MATH ..

     

     

     3440 x 1440 = 4,953,600  (pixels / frame)
    4,953,600 x 144 (FPS/Hz) = 713,318,400 pixels per sec

    ---using 8/10bit encoding per channel x 3 channels, ie 30 bits sent per 24

    713,318,400 x 10 (bits) x 3 (channels) = 21399552000 = 21.399 Gb/s @ 144Hz

     

    See: DisplayPort_1-2_WP.pdf

     

    DisplayPort 1.2

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    DisaplyPort 1.2 runs out of available video bandwidth before it even gets to 144Hz for a 2560x1600 

    TLSmiley Very HappyR .. Get DisplayPort 1.3