SpatialLabs Player's Image Quality is Worse than SpatialLabs Go?

FatherCreamy

I played a half-width SBS clip in both, and the SpatialLabs Player showed much more noticeable jaggedness that it made SpatialLabs Go look smooth in comparison. Is this a bug, or is it normal for the added Pop Out/Depth control?

JackE

Was it made from 2d using Go?

FatherCreamy

I used the Side-By-Side mode in Go to play the half-width SBS clip.

Playing the same clip in the SpatialLabs Player introduced jaggedness that looked like low-res aliasing.

ThomSwiss

Hmm.. I just created a new thread basically saying the opposite (SpatialLabs Player's Image Quality better than SpatialLabs Go). I stated that SpatialLabs Player's has noticeably less crosstalk/ghosting than SpatialLabs Go. It’s like Viewshift off-centered in SpacialLabs Go (though Viewshift can’t be adjusted in SpacialLabs Go, for whatever reason).

https://community.acer.com/en/discussion/702472/no-viewshift-setting-for-spaciallabs-go-viewshift-off-centered-in-spaciallabs-go

But I can see what you mean: in terms of image resolution, it seems that SpacialLabs Go would win against SpatialLabs Player. It’s like the Player would have less resolution or some pixelation. The Player lacks vital functions anyway (language selection, subtiltes, aspect ratio). So SpacialLabs Go currently is the way to go for sbs movie consumtion. It would just be so valuable to have the same Viewshift adjustments like in SpatialLabs Player.

https://community.acer.com/en/discussion/702464/spatiallabs-player-is-top-quality-but-lacks-of-vital-functions-audio-subtitle-aspect-radio