HAL_9000 Devotee WiFi Icon

Comments

  • then you should use YCbCr444 for best image quality. i believe the RGB color space does not contain all the YCbCr444 colors. YCbCr422 is using chroma subsampling.
  • @Junyosenkan that looks to me like color compression. are you using schoma subsampling ? (for 10 bit color @ 200Hz, you must drop some color information with DP1.4)
  • wait for some remeasurements from tftcentral using this new firmware. i am also curious what they did.
  • They cant fix slow response times without significant ghosting due to overdrive. For this VA panels, the spread of the pixel response times varies from 4ms for bright transitions to 45ms for black transitions, while the frame time @200Hz is 5ms. This causes inversion artefacts, smearing, ghosting and flickering, depending…
  • @SilentMarket is it possible to drive the black pixels with a different overdrive pulse than the brighter ones ? (maybe in a future driver/firmware update) i believe this would potentially solve the slow response times of the black transitions, but would require a lot of extra processing. 
  • the guys from TFTcentral provide a very well made review of the PG35VQ, witch is the same monitor. Seems like the black pixels must be driven by a different, more aggressive overdrive pulse than the bright pixels. And that requires a lot of extra processing. It would have been easier to stick with IPS like the PG27 or X27
  •  @SonicB0000M what you show in that video, some people call "flickering". it does work as intended. If you use it @200Hz, the blacks are always 9 frames behind all the rest of the brighter colors. The black-to-grey transition times fit only in the 23Hz frame time. The more you increase the refresh rate above 23Hz, the more…
  • @Lyker it seems to be the same behavior many people are complaining about. you can check out this response time measurements (entire review, here): The deep blacks are many frames behind in a moving image. Unfortunately with extreme overdrive you will have significant overshoot. This issue cannot be fixed since it is an…
  • @riffles21 maybe Kaiserlol did not set up the monitor to reproduce the issue... overdrive set to normal, 144Hz, 10bit. i wont believe it since @TweetiePie also fails to prove his monitor is not flickering. @Kaiserlol can you show a non flickering PG35 ? you have here in this thread the crosstalk test and the snowy village…
  • By turning OFF the overdrive, makes this a 60Hz monitor due to ~16ms G2G average pixel response time. Are the true blacks worth it, taking into consideration they will always be many frames behind the rest of the image (6 frames behind @144Hz and 9 frames behind @200Hz)?
  • @Lyker what about the interlace tests ? do they affect the pixels outside of the window when moved around ? What is ur monitor, X35 or PG35 ? I dont know why most of your settings are disabled... as far as i know, that happens with HDR enabled. @Feklar Will you keep your monitor ? is the issue worth overlooking for the HDR…
  • @TweetiePie The only reason i am here is to make an informed decision regarding my next monitor purchase. Here are some offenders of this display: https://pcmonitors.info/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/snowy-village.jpg http://www.techmind.org/lcd/crosstalk1.html http://www.techmind.org/lcd/crosstalk2.html…
  • maybe the AG353UCG will make the flaw clearer once AOC releases it. As much as i wanted a HDR1000 high refresh UW, i personally lost hope it will behave differently since it uses the same VA panel driven by the same G-sync module :/
  • @SilentMarket there are always tradeofs. those deep blacks will always be ~9 frames behind @200Hz or 6 frames behind @144Hz on this monitors. The true advantage of this monitors over IPS is the deep blacks witch with a 45ms transition time is a smeary mess, and strobe-like flickering in some scenarios, and scanlines due do…
  • @SilentMarket check out this review, m8. https://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/asus_rog_swift_pg35vq.htm this guys know what they are doing. the numbers are legit. this is not a 200Hz panel. It is a 120Hz capable panel paired with a 200Hz capable driver. A scooter with a V12 engine
  • @SilentMarket the higher the contrast, the more significant and obvious the flickering problem becomes. The refresh rate part comes into play due to overdriving a very slow VA panel... you cannot pair a VA panel with a 200Hz driver... it makes absolutely no sense. 7.5 ms avg G2G fits in a 130Hz window... any refresh rate…
  • this panel also fails to deliver a true >130Hz experience due to low VA pixel response times of ~7.5ms G2G average. The out-of-black transisions are the biggest problem: 44ms (lol) witch fits inside a 23Hz frame time. So, to be fair, this monitor is like pairing a 800hp V12 engine with a scooter. Any fps > 23Hz will cause…
  • i also use a IPS and a TN monitor, and none have any kind of issues OUTSIDE the browser window. It does flicker inside the window, but no interlace / inversion problems / backlight flicker outside the browser window. It seems to me it must be a VA problem witch is more obvious with increased contrast. It is not the only…
  • could be the same issue the Z35p has: https://community.acer.com/en/discussion/536075/z35p-g-sync-flicker
  • @KingFisher i tend to believe this review is legit: https://pcmonitors.info/reviews/acer-x35/ scroll down about 1/2 to find the exact part where is refering to this issue.
Avatar