FPS versus Load

TDK1044
TDK1044 Member Posts: 19 Troubleshooter
edited March 2023 in 2017 Archives

So maybe one of the techies here can explain something that puzzles me.....if the maximum refresh rate on most Laptop screens and monitors is 60 frames per second, what does it matter if your video card can deliver more than that? I have the Helios 300 which I love, and I'm going to be doing some Beta testing for a game coming out at the end of the year. The Devs tell me that my Helios 300 will deliver a steady 70fps at the highest settings, but that anything over 60 is really redundant. They tell me that the load that the device can hande is more important than fps once you hit 60, and that my Helios 300 will handle their game very well. So why do people spend so much time trying to squeeze another 10 fps out of a Laptop already delivering more than 60fps?

Answers

  • beststevie
    beststevie ACE Posts: 506 Pioneer

    I think first of all you could attach an external Monitor to verify, if you can regocnize any difference. My eyes are quite old and for me Full HD is really enough.

     

    But if my son plays counterstrike there is a real difference in "to be or not to be". If you do a full turn around in one second and it is divided in 120 parts it makes a difference to 60 parts and you might be dead only because of the better hardware of your oponent. Sais my son.

     

    I play best at 60fps with VSYNC on.

  • TDK1044
    TDK1044 Member Posts: 19 Troubleshooter

    Interesting. Thanks for the response. Smiley Happy

  • angomy
    angomy Member Posts: 48 Die Hard WiFi Icon

    There is no point in running higher fps than what your monitor can support, because it literally cannot display it.  Now, g-sync WILL make a difference in terms of keeping your frames constant without tearing.  But excess fps is useless and there's really no reason to let it ramp up unnecessarily.