Problems in network traffic, internet browsing

wlmachado
wlmachado Member Posts: 7 New User
edited September 2023 in 2019 Archives
Everyone, this is it.

I have a Acer Aspire F5-573G-50KS Notebook ACER with windows 10 Pro installed (I have original license). My problem is that the internet browsing is very bad, the signal quality varies a lot. Most of the time the connection speed looks like a 2G cell phone or the problem I'm disconnected from the internet, even via cable or wifi.

What I've already tried:
  • Original acer website drivers;
  • Notebook-side signal repeater
  • I put a usb nano receiver;
  • I tried via cable rj-45
  • I moved to the internet provider.
  • On all other devices: Other notebook, cell phones, TV's. All these devices work normally.
  • I installed Ubuntu (Linux) and the navigation was smooth and without traffic problem.

The problem of using a linux is that I lose in software that I am accustomed to and the performance of the dedicated video card. Has anyone else had a similar problem? Did you solve it?

Answers

  • JackE
    JackE ACE Posts: 44,889 Trailblazer
    Try right clicking the wifi tray icon and follow the troubleshooting steps. Actually works sometimes.  :) Jack E/NJ

    Jack E/NJ

  • wlmachado
    wlmachado Member Posts: 7 New User
    JackE disse:
    Try right clicking the wifi tray icon and follow the troubleshooting steps. Actually works sometimes.  :) Jack E/NJ
    So, not seen as a network problem and no problem at all. And when it detects, it exhausts the possibilities and does not solve
  • JackE
    JackE ACE Posts: 44,889 Trailblazer
    >>>I put a usb nano receiver;>>>

    Is this what you're trying to use? Jack E/NJ

    Jack E/NJ

  • wlmachado
    wlmachado Member Posts: 7 New User
    JackE disse:
    >>>I put a usb nano receiver;>>>

    Is this what you're trying to use? Jack E/NJ
    this is a attempt i tried but not changed my problem. i tried with nano receiver and via cable rj-45 and wifi
  • JackE
    JackE ACE Posts: 44,889 Trailblazer
    Just to confirm, rj-45 directly to the router is also bad? Jack E/NJ

    Jack E/NJ